Lecture 10: 03 February, 2009

We started with a brief introduction to EICC (Electronics Industry Code of Conduct) which has been endorsed by companies like HP, Panosonic, Sony, Philips etc. Since the code is applicable to the suppliers of these giant electronics companies, it is imperative that it is applicable to them as well. The EICC code elaborates the minimum requirements in five dimensions, viz., (1) Labour, (2) Health & Safety, (3) Environmental, (4) Management Systems and (5) Ethics. Suppliers to the electronics industry are assessed based on the sub-clauses of these five main clauses and generally they cease to be the suppliers if they exhibit any major non-conformance over a long period. Certain issues like Child Labour, Forced Labour, Extended working hours, discrimination, bribery, corruption are strict NOs for these major companies; any non-conformance in these areas warrant an immediate cessation of business with the supplier.

We also quickly went through the ten principles of Global Compact; Global Compact is an initiative of the United Nations for the business and industry urging them to follow the principles:

Human Rights

Principle 1: Businesses should support and respect the protection of internationally proclaimed human rights; and
Principle 2: make sure that they are not complicit in human rights abuses.

Labour Standards

Principle 3: Businesses should uphold the freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining;
Principle 4: the elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labour;
Principle 5: the effective abolition of child labour; and
Principle 6: the elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and occupation.

Environment

Principle 7: Businesses should support a precautionary approach to environmental challenges;
Principle 8: undertake initiatives to promote greater environmental responsibility; and
Principle 9: encourage the development and diffusion of environmentally friendly technologies.

Anti-Corruption

Principle 10: Businesses should work against corruption in all its forms, including extortion and bribery.

We studied all the above principles under different headings throughout the present lectures. I explained to you as to what is the meaning of the "Precautionary Principle" - i.e. extreme caution is required in introducing new substances, technologies or activities that may affect the environment and Health & Safety of people, when decisions are taken with limited scientific data; precautionary principle is mostly applied when chemical and radio-active substances are involved. This also needs to be applied when questions about the eco-system stability arise due to activities or projects. At the same time, lack of scientific knowledge should not come in the way of preventing pollution.

We then moved to the third part of the syllabus - regarding the results of implementing Sustainability in organizations and the evaluation of organizations by stakeholders for their sustainability performance. The first topic taken up was Sustainability Reporting as per GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) G-3 guideline (i.e. the third revision of the GRI reporting guideline).

The following trends are responsible partly for organizations going for publicly reporting their sustainability performance:(1) Expanding Globalization (2)Search for new forms of global governance, (3) Reforms of Corporate governance, (4) Global role of emerging economies (BRICA), (5) Rising visibility and expectations for organizations, (6) Measurement of Progress toward Sustainability, (7) Governments’ interest in Sustainability Reporting, (8) Financial Markets’ interest in Sustainability Reporting, (9) Emergence of next generation accounting etc.

Like the Financial Accounting, Environmental Accounting also has two major disciplines, viz, environmental financial accounting and environmental management accounting. Environmental Financial Accounting deals with accounting for and reporting on environmental transactions and events that affect, or will likely to affect, the financial position of the business. It ensures that environmental costs and liabilities are accounted for by following relevant accounting standards or, in their absence, generally accepted accounting practices and meaningful disclosure of the environmental performance of the business is provided to the stakeholders.
Environmental Management accounting deals with Identification, Collection, Estimation, Analysis, Use, reporting of material & energy flow information, environmental & other cost information for internal purposes. It ensures that appropriate management accounting procedures are, where necessary, developed, and used, for instance, to cost out pollution controls, to compare alternative materials that can be used in manufacturing, and to investigate recycling alternatives etc.

We discussed about the usefulness of environmental accounting in decsion making using two examples, one on energy consumption ($/unit and GJ/unit or Kg of CO2 per unit) and another on waste generation (value in $ or % of cost of material or cost of disposal of hazardous waste generated). We discussed how environmental accounting information in combination with the financial data can help managers to take appropriate decisions.

Environmental Accounting helps the organization to: (1)encourage defensive and prudent operations and waste reduction, (2 improve manufacturing, waste disposal and shipping practices, (3) negotiate and settle disputes with insurance carriers, (4) influence regulators and public policy makers, (5) determine suitable levels of financial resources, (6) reassess corporate strategy and management practices (think green), (7) articulate comprehensive risk management programme, (8) improve public citizenship, (9) identify hidden risks in take-overs and acquisitions etc.

Environmnental reporting is the disclosure by an entity of environmentally related data (verified or not) on environmental risks, impacts, policies, strategies, targets, costs, liabilities, or performance to those who have an interest in such information as an aid to enabling / enriching their relationship with the reporting entity. Compare this with the objective of the Financial reporting: "to provide information about the financial position, performance and changes in financial position of an enterprise that is useful to a wide range of users in making economic decisions". Environmental (Sustainability) reporting has the objective of enabling/enriching RELATIONSHIP with ALL STAKEHOLDERS, not for taking economic decisions alone. Hence such reports should be prepared to REACH all types of stakehodlers - local, internationa, educated, not so well educated, NGOs, Government etc. The structure of the Sustainability Report therefore is expected to be different from that of a Financial Report. Normally the Sustainability report has 33 % text, 33 % pictures/photos and 33 % tables and graphs to appeal to majority of the stakeholders.

GRI G-3 provides a framework for such a report. Important subjects to note are: (a) Report content - dealing with materiality, Stakeholder Inclusiveness, sustainability context & completeness, (b) Quality - dealing with balance, comparability, accuracy, timeliness, clarity and reliability and (c)boundary setting. Three different kinds of disclosures (strategy and profile, management approach and performance indicators) of the organization should appear in the report. Indicators are of two types - Core Indicators and Additional indicators.

Core Indicators are those Indicators identified in the GRI Guidelines to be of interest to most stakeholders and assumed to be material unless deemed otherwise on the basis of the GRI Reporting Principles (e.g. EC1- Direct economic value generated and distributed, including revenues, operating costs, employee compensation, donations and other community investments, retainedearnings, and payments to capital providers and governments; EN1 - Materials used by weight or volume; EN19 - Emissions of ozone-depleting substances by weightEC5 Range of ratios of standard entry level wage compared to local minimum wage at significant locations of operation.; LA1- Total workforce by employment type,employment contract, and region; HR4 Total number of incidents of discrimination and actions taken etc.)

Additional Indicators are those Indicators identified in the GRI Guidelines that represent emerging practice or address topics that may be material to some
organizations but not generally for a majority (e.g.EC5- Range of ratios of standard entry level wage compared to local minimum wage at significant locations of operation; EC9 - Understanding and describing significant indirect economic impacts, including the extent of impacts; EN5- Energy saved due to conservation and efficiency improvements; EN18 - Initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reductions achieved; EN30 - Total environmental protection expenditures and investments by type; LA3 - Benefits provided to full-time employees that are not provided to temporary or part-time employees, by major operations;SO6 - Total value of financial and in-kind contributions to political parties, politicians,and related institutions by country etc.). We also referred to ISO-14031 for more environmental indicators.

The GRI reports are classified as A, B or C and if verified by a third party A+, B+, C+. A, B & C refer to beginner, between beginner and the advanced and the advanced reporters. (+) is an indication of the verification by an independent third party verifiers.

Note: Two students have copied the folder containing all the codes and standards relevant to this lecture. I request them to share the documents with other students. If you have a pen-drive, we can download these documents to your pen drive before or after the next class (i.e. 09 February, 2009)

In the second hour we continued with the reading of the paper Green and Competitive by Porter and Linde. We have completed up to Good Regulation vs. Bad (p.129). We will continue with the reading this paper in the next class (09 Feb 2009).